System and vendor context
Track AI-related assets, owners, environments, vendors, contracts, and documentation.
EU AI ACT GOVERNANCE
Govern AI systems with evidence, ownership, and human accountability.
AI governance requires more than a model register. Technolay links systems and use cases to classification, accountable owners, technical and organizational measures, documentation, monitoring, incidents, and human decisions.
Operational viewEvidence current
Risk-basedgovernance
Humanoversight
Traceabletechnical documentation
1Inventory
2Classify
3Implement governance
Illustrative product workflow. No customer compliance data is shown.
Who this is for
Built around the work, not a marketing score.
Providers and deployers of AI systems in the EU
Organizations inventorying AI use across vendors and internal products
Risk teams preparing an accountable AI governance process
Risk and control workflow
Confirm applicability, assign gaps, retain decisions, and verify implementation.
Human oversight
Record owners, approvers, training, incident response, and review rather than presenting AI output as final truth.
Controlled evidence
Govern policies, procedures, technical records, versions, approvals, and signatures.
How it works
A visible path from context to reviewed evidence.
01
Inventory
Identify systems, purposes, providers, deployers, users, data, and affected processes.
02
Classify
Record the risk and applicability decision with reasoning.
03
Implement governance
Assign technical, documentation, monitoring, people, and vendor work.
04
Monitor and review
Retain incidents, changes, assessments, approvals, and current evidence.
Where automation stops
- Technolay does not make binding legal classifications.
- AI analysis is assistive and cannot replace required human oversight.
- Obligations and transition dates should be confirmed against current official guidance.
Continue exploring
Frequently asked
Practical answers, without overclaiming.
Can Technolay determine whether an AI system is high-risk?
It can structure facts and suggest a classification, but the organization and its advisers own the legal decision.
Does the platform expose AI decisions as final?
No. Suggestions carry confidence and reasoning and require human acceptance or override.
Can third-party AI services be tracked?
Yes. Vendor, contract, data-access, assessment, DPA, and documentation records can be linked to the governance process.
Authoritative sources
We cite primary sources and describe Technolay as an independent implementation platform. Source ownership and official interpretation remain with the named publisher.
See how this fits your real environment.
We will use your frameworks, infrastructure, evidence sources, and operating model—not a generic sales deck.
Book a demo