Source-aware requirements
Retain framework name, version, citation, code, description, and disclaimer.
CUSTOM FRAMEWORKS
Model customer, regulator, and internal requirements without duplicating the work.
Not every obligation arrives as a public standard. Customer assurance schedules, supervisory expectations, internal policies, and contract clauses still need traceable ownership and evidence. Custom frameworks bring them into the same operating model.
Operational viewEvidence current
Canonicalcontrol reuse
Mappedframework codes
Oneevidence trail
1Define the source
2Import or author requirements
3Map carefully
Illustrative product workflow. No customer compliance data is shown.
Who this is for
Built around the work, not a marketing score.
Organizations with customer-specific assurance requirements
Teams combining public frameworks and internal controls
Compliance programs managing contractual or supervisory obligations
Canonical mapping
Map an obligation to an existing control where the intended outcome genuinely overlaps.
No duplicate evidence work
Reuse relevant implementation and artifacts while preserving framework-specific reporting.
Same operational workflow
Use discovery, gap analysis, tasks, modules, connectors, review, and audit history.
How it works
A visible path from context to reviewed evidence.
01
Define the source
Record origin, version, scope, and usage disclaimer.
02
Import or author requirements
Create clear, trackable requirement-level entries.
03
Map carefully
Reuse canonical controls only when the intended outcome aligns.
04
Operate and report
Use the same evidence and review model as built-in frameworks.
Where automation stops
- Similarity must be reviewed; superficially related requirements should not be merged.
- Custom content should preserve source citations and licensing restrictions.
- Framework mappings do not imply endorsement by the source publisher.
Continue exploring
Frequently asked
Practical answers, without overclaiming.
Can we import a customer security schedule?
Yes, subject to the source's rights and a clear mapping review.
Will one artifact satisfy every mapped requirement?
Only when its content and operating context actually cover each requirement; reviewers decide sufficiency per control.
Can custom frameworks use connectors and modules?
Yes. They use the same canonical control, implementation, evidence, and review infrastructure.
Authoritative sources
We cite primary sources and describe Technolay as an independent implementation platform. Source ownership and official interpretation remain with the named publisher.
See how this fits your real environment.
We will use your frameworks, infrastructure, evidence sources, and operating model—not a generic sales deck.
Book a demo